What’s the Environmental Impact of Bitcoin? Here’s Everything You Should Know

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
"Elon Musk just announced Tesla will no longer accept Bitcoin. Here's the environmental impact of cryptocurrency."

Cryptocurrency has been a hot topic lately. It’s not just something that’s on environmentalists’ minds, though. Earlier this year, even Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla Motors, shared it’s a major concern of his, too. So much so that Tesla decided to suspend vehicle purchases using Bitcoin.

Musk tweeted he’s concerned about the “rapidly increasing use of fossil fuels for Bitcoin mining and transactions”—particularly coal, as Bitcoin is primarily mined with electricity from coal. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, coal is the dominant CO2 emissions source in terms of electricity generation, and accounted for 60 percent of electric power sector CO2 emissions.

“Cryptocurrency is a good idea on many levels and we believe it has a promising future, but this cannot come at great cost to the environment,” Musk says. “Tesla will not be selling any Bitcoin and we intend to use it for transactions as soon as mining transitions to more sustainable energy.”

Instead, Musk said he would be looking at other cryptocurrency options that use less than one percent of Bitcoin’s energy use for transactions. This announcement came as a surprise to many, and CNBC reported that it instantly wiped hundreds of billions of dollars from the cryptocurrency market. Some are also questioning his decision, including Lolli, a Bitcoin rewards company.

After his announcement, the company said it has suspended buying Teslas and is questioning Musk’s facts: “We are deeply concerned about the CEO’s inability to understand that Bitcoin is largely mined with renewable energy (est. 75 percent),” the tweet reads. So, what’s the truth about the environmental impact of Bitcoin?

environmental impact of bitcoin

The Environmental Impact of Bitcoin

Bitcoin mining generates 38 million tons of CO2 per year, which is more than the carbon footprint of Slovakia. In addition, a 2018 study published in Nature Climate Change found Bitcoin emissions alone could raise Earth’s temperature by two degrees.

“Bitcoin is a proof-of-work blockchain, meaning it uses a proof-of-work (PoW) consensus mechanisms to secure the blockchain and verify transactions. PoW means that miners compete against each other to mine a block,” Susanne Köhler, a PhD fellow and sustainable blockchain technology researcher at Aalborg University in Denmark, tells us. “In these competitions, specialized computers generate several trillions of guesses per second to try and win. You could call it a brute-force approach. This is what requires a lot of electricity.”

While a popular—and heavily cited—past survey did find 76 percent of cryptocurrency miners use some renewable energy, Forbes reports it’s not that simple. The same survey also found just 39 percent of the actual power consumed is from renewables—aka a pretty big drop. “Much of the ‘renewables’ being counted here, of course, are hydropower from China, and that’s seasonal,” writes reporter Rob Day. “In dry times of the year, those same regional miners are using mostly coal-fired power.”

“In the end, the climate doesn’t care what percentage of your electricity mix is from renewables and which is from fossil fuels. The atmosphere only cares about how much absolute fossil fuel emissions are released,” Day says. “To make this point extremely clear with an extreme hypothetical—if fossil fuels drop from 60 percent of the electricity consumption mix of Bitcoin miners to 30 percent, but the amount of electricity consumption goes up 4x, you’ve still doubled the amount of related fossil fuel emissions.”

Day says you help drive down the cost of new renewables along the way, which could be beneficial down the line. “But in the more important immediate term, you’re making things much worse,” he notes.

environmental impact of bitcoin

Can Cryptocurrency Become More Sustainable?

There’s still a lot of work to be done in order to lessen the environmental impact of Bitcoin and other types of cryptocurrency. For example, Ethereum, the world’s second-largest cryptocurrency (right after Bitcoin), has “Ethereum 2.0” in the works in order to become more sustainable and drastically cut its energy consumption.

“Ethereum is a proof-of-work blockchain and is moving away from proof-of-work to proof-of-stake to secure their blockchain and verify transactions,” Köhler says, which makes the process more sustainable. “However, this is no trivial task and takes time. Using a different (non-PoW blockchain) could also address this.”

More eco-friendly options are starting to emerge, too. Take Nano, for instance, which is said to “shun traditional mining” and instead use Open Representative Voting (ORV), which TRG Datacenters says “promises minimal energy consumption and maximum efficiency.”

The more the world pushes for these greener systems, the better off the planet will be.

Hey there! Want to help us change the world every day through easy, achievable, eco-friendly tips and tricks? Sign up for the Brightly Spot and join our movement of over a million changemakers.

Elon Musk just announced Tesla will no longer accept Bitcoin. Here's the environmental impact of cryptocurrency.

This post may contain affiliate links. Brightly will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking on these links.





at Brightly, we believe in the power of every day actions and conscious consumerism to change the world.

Everyone is welcome. Join our movement. The world is waiting.

good news. delivered.